The real reason X Factor judges don’t want Christopher Maloney to win

Christopher MaloneyThe X Factor reached crisis point this weekend, when one of the hot favourites, Ella Henderson, was booted out after no-one voted for her.

According to the Daily Mail both the X Factor judges and Twitter went into meltdown, because she was nailed on right from the beginning as the one to beat.

In contrast, Christopher Maloney – the act who didn’t originally make Gary’s final 3, but was brought back from the cold in a public vote – has been pulling in the votes, despite being dismissed as cheesy and ‘not relevant’ by the judges.

In fact, there seems to be a concerted campaign to stop Christopher winning this year. Louis Walsh even admitted as such in a Guardian interview at the weekend, saying they’ve “got to find a way to stop Christopher Maloney from winning X Factor”.

So why is “Mr Shake and Fake” – as the other contestants call Christopher Maloney – such a threat?

Not a trained monkey

The bottom line is that Christopher Maloney is a wildcard – in more senses than one.

You see, the majority of contestants who reach the final stages of X Factor are anything but ‘amateur pop hopefuls’. They’ve nearly all got managers before they audition, according to finalist Kye Sones.

In an interview given to The Standard after leaving the show in early November, he revealed that practically every artist has management.

It seems that Christopher Maloney doesn’t fall into that category. He’s not as malleable.

The Brookstein effect

Simon Cowell is nervous, because he can see Steve Brookstein all over again. The winner of the first ever series of X Factor in 2004 briefly flickered before ending up on the trash-heap of failed former contestants.

And, although there’s no guarantee that winning X Factor can guarantee you a long-lasting pop career (see Shayne Ward, Joe McElderry and Matt Cardle for proof), it’s much easier if Simon Cowell has something to work with.

From his eyrie in LA, he would have looked at the likes of Jahmene and Ella and seen dollar signs = in much the same way he did with Leona Lewis.

Christopher Maloney – on the other hand – is popular enough while the show is on, but his appeal outside the confines of the Fountain Studios on a Saturday night is limited.

What about Britain’s Got Talent success?

There are many who will be citing the likes of Susan Boyle or Paul Potts for proof that you don’t have to be young and attractive to make it big, but they’re forgetting that both of them had a strong USP and were discovered not on a singing show, but a ‘talent’ show.

Potts was the insurance salesman with the operatic voice that blew everyone else away.

Boyle was the frumpy, slightly dotty Scotswoman who ‘sang like an angel’.

Maloney? His USP is that he’s a cheesy, camp, Scouse, mummy’s boy. And you can probably find them in any number of holiday camps, wearing a red coat.

Don’t panic yet, Simon

The chances are, Christopher will implode before the end, and Jahmene will walk off with the crown. However, if he does win, it will be interesting to see how much they invest in his career, following the obligatory Xmas single.

Keep watching this space…

Who would you want as a role model: Hina Khan or Amy Childs?

Hina Khan and Amy ChildsTwo weeks ago, there was widespread condemnation of the Taliban, when they shot Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai in the head for speaking out about girls’ education.

Hina Khan

Now, another Pakistani schoolgirl, 17-year-old Hina Khan, has been threatened for doing the same thing and has asked the Pakistani Government for extra protection – something they seem unwilling to give.

These two schoolgirls are both amazing role models for girls in a country where education of women is still seen, by many extremists, as needless and ‘un-Islamic’.

Amy Childs

Now compare the actions of Hina and Malala with one of Britain’s current, most high-profile role-models, Amy Childs, famous for being the country’s self-proclaimed ‘vajazzle queen’ and appearing in reality TV shows.

I know Pakistan and the UK are very different countries, but step back for a second and compare the two.

Who would you want as a role model: Hina Khan or Amy Childs?

Finding ‘meaning’ at work

Meaning 2012 logoYesterday I went to one of the most inspiring conferences I’ve ever attended – Meaning 2012, put on by the fantastic Nixon McInnes in Brighton.

The conference’s tagline sounds fairly innocuous – “for better 21st-century business” – but, boy, did it deliver, with a wonderful range of speakers, who all had tremendous stories to tell, insights to give and messages to send out.

Power of small actions

From propaganda gardening, via jeans with their own personal history, to mutality together and a hexayurt, the cross-section of inspiring stories was a wonder to behold.

But if one message came through over again and again throughout the day, it was the power of small actions having a large and positive effect.

Karen Pine told the story of a man who was taking part in her Do Something Different programme and a simple, spontaneous 15-minute walk led to the most profound changes in his life (for the better).

Meanwhile, Indy Johar cited the example of Rutland Telecom, who started as a tiny group determined to improve one village’s web connections and now offer the fastest county-wide broadband in the country.

And as for Pam Warhurst’s rallying cry and her Incredible Edible project in Todmorden – well, you wouldn’t say ‘no’ to her, I can tell you.

The stage at Meaning 2012More than subversion

At every turn, there were countless examples of people having a great idea and just going off and doing something about it. Forget bureaucracy or red tape – it’s all about trying to make an impact in relatively small ways.

But one thing was clear – this is not about subversion. The fact that this conference happened in ‘sandal-wearing, lentil-munching Brighton’ shouldn’t be seen as a reason to dismiss the topics debated as being ‘trendy and liberal’.

Meaning is all about about doing small things to try to take (back) control and put people and honesty at the heart of business.

As Alexander Kjerulf cited in his talk yesterday – the two most important things about work are meaningful results and the relationships we have at work and if we don’t value them, why do we bother in the first place?