*** 30/05/17 UPDATE: I’ve chased up GTR again for further progress and had a new response.
Latest platitudes at base of post ***
*** 11/11/16 UPDATE: I have finally, received a reply to my complaints about the new 700 Class trains. See addition at base of post ***
For my sins I spend around 15 hours a week commuting on the Thameslink line between London and Brighton.
Since the franchise passed to Govia, we have been promised new trains. It now appears we have them. I have got on new rolling stock twice today and my bewilderment over the things that appear to be wrong has only increased.
The good points
I should acknowledge some improvements. The on board electronic information (see main photo) is much better and clearer, including details on how busy carriages are and whether the on board toilets are working.
The awkward interconnecting doors have largely been removed. They were rubbish and broke continually.
What isn’t so good?
In two journeys, this is what I’ve noticed so far.
1) The number of seats has been reduced. This seems like an enormous issue. The trains may now be 12 coaches long, but giving people more room in which to stand isn’t exactly a progressive move.
Given the frequency with which coaches seem to break I can’t see 12 coach trains being constant.
2) There are no arm-rests. If you cut the number of seats you could at least make it comfy for those who aren’t standing. But no. Anyone with an oversized rear end or sharp elbows will make their companion very uncomfortable,
Is this really such a cost-saving against passenger comfort?
3) No increase in baggage storage. The Thameslink line travels to 2 of the country’s biggest airports: Gatwick and Luton. Lots of people use the train to get to and from these airports and travel with large suitcases.
There never used to be adequate space to stow this luggage. There still isn’t. A massive oversight
They will now have to awkwardly balance their laptop on their knees (yes, I know it’s called a ‘lap’top for a reason), which isn’t hugely comfortable.
5) No charging points. Intermediate rolling stock had plug sockets to allow phone/laptop charging. No more!
I tweeted this oversight and received this reply from @TLRailUK
@robram Hi Rob, the Department for Transport are looking at the possibility of getting these fitted; a decision will be made by ministers ^I
— Thameslink (@TLRailUK) July 29, 2016
Why would you build something without and then be forced to add afterwards?
Where are the user needs in all of this?
When you design a new product, you ask what customers want! In a commuter train, you’d be looking for comfort, useful functionality, seats… you get my drift?
I get the impression these new trains have been designed with not a single piece of customer feedback.
I pay Govia in excess of £4k a year to use their trains. The least they could do is solicit opinons from me (or people like me).
Prove me wrong Govia, or at the very least show me what audience research you did.
‘Thank you for getting in touch and letting us know your views on our new Class 700 trains.
You have mentioned a number of issues and I am grateful to provide more information on some of these:
In regards to your comments on the sockets, most tablets, smartphones and laptops have good battery life – iPads, for example, offer up to 10 hours and laptops between three to nine hours. As very few Thameslink passengers will have journeys of not much more than an hour – with many journeys of only around 30 minutes- it did not justify the large cost and significant weight increase (the trains were specified to be lightweight) that would be incurred installing power points throughout 1,140 carriages.
My reaction: what a joke! Don’t put plugs in because everyone gets on a train with a fully-charged device, don’t they?
In regards to the tables and seat-back flip-down tables, passenger research for rail watchdog Passenger Focus and London TravelWatch carried out to inform the design of the train showed that people recognised the main priority was to maximise capacity so they were not incorporated into the specification. Seat tables can also slow people down getting on and off trains – and we’ll have just 30 seconds to get people on and off these new trains in central London.
My reaction: the thought that people are unable to prepare for their station and that a lack of table gives extra time to get off is ludicrous. The reduced ‘capacity’ no seat back table offers is irrelevant compared to the usefulness of having a table; somewhere to rest a drink, a snack, a book or paper.
However, the DfT is exploring opportunities for fitting charging points for laptops and other mobile devices on the new Thameslink trains. A decision will be made by Ministers. The DfT is also working with Siemens and GTR on a proposal to provide seat back tables. These would be retro-fitted to trains that have already been built.
My reaction: the subtext here is Govia knows the decision was wrong.
Regarding the seats, the design was undertaken by Fainsa, on behalf of First Capital Connect (pre-2014) in conjunction with Siemens. The design is the same as current 387 seats, and a number of other fleets, which have been in service for several years. Its ergonomic design has been created to be comfortable for people of varying heights.
The final choice of design was done in conjunction with stakeholders and user groups, such as London Travel Watch and Passenger focus and included testers of all shapes and sizes including those who were over 6ft and comfort improvements were made to the original design as a result of this.
The materials and design have been chosen to be hard wearing, being able to withstand usual and unusual wear and tear including vandalism (slashing/burning of seats) and meets all current standards including crash worthiness and fire.
I hope this information is of use and please accept my apologies for any inconvenience caused.
My reaction: the design may be the same, but they’ve clearly used less padding and the removal of arm rests means they’re closer together.
I would also like to thank you again for taking the time to contact us and let you know that we appreciate your comments. these have been passed on to the relevant team as feedback.’
Overall, at least they’ve replied, but they still ignored my questions about arm rests, baggage space and reduced seating.
As I understand, the trains were ordered by the previous operator (Thameslink) so Govia didn’t have a say. However, they clearly decided to bite the bullet and not make any improvements before putting them into service.
Now they’re probably ruing that decision as they will have to take the new trains out of service in order to retro-fit plug sockets and seat back tables.
As it was six months since my last contact with Thameslink, I got in touch again to see how that ‘retrofitting’ was going.
Here’s what they told me this time:
In regards to your query relating to seat back tables, Ministers have committed to the fitting of WiFi and seat back tables to the new class 700 Thameslink trains.
Future trains being manufactured by Siemens will include these changes and the Department is holding discussions with Siemens, Cross London Trains (the rolling stock owner) and Govia Thameslink Railway about the best way to retrofit the trains already manufactured.
In regards to plug sockets, we are currently still in talks in relation to retrofitting trains as well as adding them to the design of all future trains for this franchise.
Essentially, very little has changed. The response above is almost identical to the original platitudes, promising no timescale and no genuine action.
Almost a year on from the arrival of the new rolling stock, we appear to be no closer to the appearance of charging points and seatback tables.